Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 16:22:55 GMT
Is Holder riding ? he does not appear in betting either Both quoted now, looks like west ham running order only doubt. Holder 50-1 to score a 15pt max
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 16:31:10 GMT
It would now appear we are looking at;
west ham
Jonsson Lanham R/R Davidsson(J) Jedrzejak Kling Jablonski
Poole
Holder Zetterstrom Pedersen(B) Skornicki Watt Eriksson Davidsson(D)
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Oct 6, 2008 16:54:50 GMT
Both quoted now, looks like west ham running order only doubt. Holder 50-1 to score a 15pt max Hatcham - no chance, you'd be better off going for Jonsson to score an 18-point max. Although even that's doubtful, as I think Bjarne Pedersen is shit hot around Lakeside.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 16:58:49 GMT
Holder 50-1 to score a 15pt max Hatcham - no chance, you'd be better off going for Jonsson to score an 18-point max. Although even that's doubtful, as I think Bjarne Pedersen is shit hot around Lakeside. Not a tip from me Genghis, merely stating a fact, Jonsson is 5-1 to have 5 heat wins tonight, Pedersen is 12-1.
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Oct 6, 2008 18:28:09 GMT
There's a lot of unknowns tonight - Jablonski could either have a cracker or do nothing, Jonas is still recovering and we don't really know how he'll go on the smaller Lakeside track, and R/R probably won't score as much as Adam would have done. I'd love to see Lakeside win by the predicted double figures, but they've pulled so many rabbits out of the bag this year I'm wondering if there are any bunnies left.
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Oct 6, 2008 18:51:10 GMT
Can't help but think Lakeside have shot themselves in the foot with that track. Should have had at least two points in heat 2.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:02:02 GMT
Can't help but think Lakeside have shot themselves in the foot with that track. Should have had at least two points in heat 2. Yet more odd refereeing. Waited too see if West ham had an advantage, then when they did, sticks red lights on !!!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:06:29 GMT
Can't help but think Lakeside have shot themselves in the foot with that track. Should have had at least two points in heat 2. Yet more odd refereeing. Waited too see if West ham had an advantage, then when they did, sticks red lights on !!!! And the re-run makes the decision even worse for the Hammers
|
|
|
Post by admin on Oct 6, 2008 19:06:39 GMT
This is shit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:07:54 GMT
Ah somewhere we can talk about a meeting in progress. Looks like the good guys are winning. ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:18:06 GMT
Poole now expected to win by 4 tonight
I dont see it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:25:33 GMT
They will win by more than 4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2008 19:25:41 GMT
Hammers have to put Jonsson off 15 here
|
|
|
Post by admin on Oct 6, 2008 19:26:05 GMT
I'm afraid the Hammers are just embarrassing tonight.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Oct 6, 2008 19:27:24 GMT
They will win by more than 4 Agreed. The Hammers will capitulate and Poole will probably win by circa 16 points on the night.
|
|