Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2008 15:41:35 GMT
Still think steve shovlar is worth a nomination.
He really is a sycophantic despicable flapperjack.
|
|
|
Post by zonkers on Oct 17, 2008 16:02:50 GMT
Still think steve shovlar is worth a nomination. He really is a sycophantic despicable flapperjack. Is that based on any one thing in particular....?
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Oct 17, 2008 16:33:23 GMT
Still think steve shovlar is worth a nomination. He really is a sycophantic despicable flapperjack. Snophie, to be honest, I'm much more likely to pick you (on the basis of the verbal abuse you gave to young Zonkers a couple of weeks ago) than Steve Shovlar.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2008 16:40:32 GMT
I think Methanol Internet could be worth a nomination for threatening legal action over comments made about his website (which isn't substandard in any way )
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2008 16:51:22 GMT
Still think steve shovlar is worth a nomination. He really is a sycophantic despicable flapperjack. Snophie, to be honest, I'm much more likely to pick you (on the basis of the verbal abuse you gave to young Zonkers a couple of weeks ago) than Steve Shovlar. I have to say i like Shovlars posts, and that includes the 95% i dont agree with. And how could anyone abuse Zonkers (or Schumi) ? their both sweeties.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Oct 17, 2008 17:33:40 GMT
And how could anyone abuse Zonkers (or Schumi) ? their both sweeties. My thoughts exactly Hatcham.
|
|
|
Post by zonkers on Oct 17, 2008 19:58:31 GMT
Ahhh....thank you both ! Well, I got called a "PRATT" on the BSF the other day too....
|
|
|
Post by nobbyclark on Oct 18, 2008 9:28:02 GMT
Ahhh....thank you both ! Well, I got called a "PRATT" on the BSF the other day too.... Must have been some relation to Lord flapperjack himself with the over useage of T's! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2008 17:58:04 GMT
Surely Dekker must be in the reckoning for wishing a rider is hurt tonight at King's Lynn. And just in case the moderators delete it How can any speedway fan (or human being for that matter) want that?
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Oct 18, 2008 22:15:43 GMT
So here are this week's results. 4. Snophie - for being unpleasant to Zonkers. As Hatcham said, Zonkers is a sweetie. 3. Dekker - for wishing serious injury or worse on a speedway rider. 2. Matt Ford - for taking the New Year Classic away from its rightful home at Newport. And, as for the winner, drumrolll.... Nah, I'm going to keep you waiting till midnight.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Oct 18, 2008 22:51:40 GMT
OK, there's a quite clear-cut winner this week....
Yes, it's Ben Powell.
Hopefully he'll get the ban he deserves and he'll never taint British Speedway again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2008 23:03:26 GMT
OK, there's a quite clear-cut winner this week.... Yes, it's Ben Powell. Hopefully he'll get the ban he deserves and he'll never taint British Speedway again. Looks like the best man won again..... ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2008 7:50:12 GMT
4. Snophie - for being unpleasant to Zonkers. As Hatcham said, Zonkers is a sweetie. it's a zonkers love in ;D Nicholls is worthy of a late 5th place for spoiling my GP (I must have been one of the few who wanted him to hit top 8 ) by messing up a piss easy heat tosser: Ht 9.. Harris , Lindgren , Nicholls , Janowski
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2008 17:48:21 GMT
Surely Dekker must be in the reckoning for wishing a rider is hurt tonight at King's Lynn. And just in case the moderators delete it How can any speedway fan (or human being for that matter) want that? I honestly don't believe Dekker wanted a fatality. He has made a balls up of the phrasing and it's come out all wrong. I am certain that if Kozza Smith rammed a rider in to KL's concrete fence like he did Derek Sneddon on Friday night we would then be looking at a fatality, and that's what I think Dekker meant too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2008 20:31:47 GMT
I honestly don't believe Dekker wanted a fatality. He has made a balls up of the phrasing and it's come out all wrong. That explanation would have far more credence if he had come out and said he put it into words wrongly. He didn't tho did he, when people question his humanity he came out with Basically more posturing and not one word of regret nor suggestion that he didn't mean what he actually wrote. I've seen a rider lose his life on a speedway track and for anyone to even hint that he would like to see it happen makes me fucking furious and no amount of apologist postings from other people will calm me down.
|
|