|
Post by admin on Dec 1, 2007 22:43:21 GMT
Who'll follow in the footsteps of tsunami, well, that'll be for Lupus decide, but we're now open for nominations.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Dec 1, 2007 22:45:44 GMT
Who'll follow in the footsteps of tsunami, well, that'll be for Lupus decide, but we're now open for nominations. No, no, no. You're doing this week and Lupus is doing next week.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 1:28:57 GMT
Who'll follow in the footsteps of tsunami, well, that'll be for Lupus decide, but we're now open for nominations. No, no, no. You're doing this week and Lupus is doing next week. Don't suppose there's much chance of you two agreeing on anything in the not-too-distant future is there? Anyhow, Since us Southern Hemisphereans always seem to be hours ahead of youse mob I'd like to nominate Robert Craig "Evel" Knievel as the first Posthumous Flapperjack of the Week for his signal failure to jump the Snake River Canyon on PPV.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 1:50:28 GMT
Who'll follow in the footsteps of tsunami, well, that'll be for Lupus decide, but we're now open for nominations. In that case, I'd like to nominate Tsunami..........you know he deserves it again lupy
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 9:21:51 GMT
Don't worry Kev he's already on the shortlist and it's only 9.25 am on Sunday!!!! ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 10:59:12 GMT
I would like to nominate the Sudanese people on the march demanding that teacher be executed
How can people take religion seriously while it is reminicent of a Monty Python sketch
bj
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 18:39:41 GMT
I'd like to nominate the silly advert at the top of the page which says you can earn £14,577. 00. per week working from home. What is it....running a brothel? ;D
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Dec 2, 2007 19:06:23 GMT
I don't normally nominate these days, but I'm so pissed off I can't help myself.
I'm sure some of you know that our interviews have been copied onto the Panthers' forum. At no time have I ever asked to be credited for the interviews - I just assumed it was common decency to quote the source. But not only have they copied them, they've also slagged off us and our members, and that just takes the biscuit.
I've not asked for any form of recognition, but I've put a lot of time and effort into those interviews - doing research, emailing various people, and posing the questions (with a little help from others, at times) and to have it thrown back in my face like that has made me more angry than I thought possible.
By all means use the interviews, but don't then go and slag us all off right after.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 20:05:00 GMT
I don't normally nominate these days, but I'm so pissed off I can't help myself. I'm sure some of you know that our interviews have been copied onto the Panthers' forum. At no time have I ever asked to be credited for the interviews - I just assumed it was common decency to quote the source. But not only have they copied them, they've also slagged off us and our members, and that just takes the biscuit. I've not asked for any form of recognition, but I've put a lot of time and effort into those interviews - doing research, emailing various people, and posing the questions (with a little help from others, at times) and to have it thrown back in my face like that has made me more angry than I thought possible. By all means use the interviews, but don't then go and slag us all off right after. Schumi that is downright ignorant & disgraceful.Aren't those people on that forum ever gonna give you a break.Keep up the good work my girl,reading those interveiws,for most of us, is a pleasure.Rigsby had better watch out.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 20:13:57 GMT
I don't normally nominate these days, but I'm so pissed off I can't help myself. I'm sure some of you know that our interviews have been copied onto the Panthers' forum. At no time have I ever asked to be credited for the interviews - I just assumed it was common decency to quote the source. But not only have they copied them, they've also slagged off us and our members, and that just takes the biscuit. I've not asked for any form of recognition, but I've put a lot of time and effort into those interviews - doing research, emailing various people, and posing the questions (with a little help from others, at times) and to have it thrown back in my face like that has made me more angry than I thought possible. By all means use the interviews, but don't then go and slag us all off right after. Come on schumi, it is the Panthers/lord flapperjack arse lickers forum, what else would you expect fog
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 20:41:40 GMT
I don't normally nominate these days, but I'm so pissed off I can't help myself. I'm sure some of you know that our interviews have been copied onto the Panthers' forum. At no time have I ever asked to be credited for the interviews - I just assumed it was common decency to quote the source. But not only have they copied them, they've also slagged off us and our members, and that just takes the biscuit. I've not asked for any form of recognition, but I've put a lot of time and effort into those interviews - doing research, emailing various people, and posing the questions (with a little help from others, at times) and to have it thrown back in my face like that has made me more angry than I thought possible. By all means use the interviews, but don't then go and slag us all off right after. I assume it's reasonably simple to know who copied them. Simple answer is ban the bastard until they have the courtesy to credit the source. If you can't work out who copied them make them members only to read so you can work it out Sod all this politically correct, freedom of information crap. If they want the kudos, let them do the bleeding work. Yes I am in a bad mood, those flapperjacks threw Kenny out
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 20:53:08 GMT
It's pure ignorance and bad manners schumi but we can't expect much else from a shower of shites like that
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 21:35:02 GMT
In so far as Rigsby is concerned it may have been a genuine oversight... and we should allow for that....However, if that is not the case Mr Rigsby, having read your signature , I think you should afford us the same courtesy , as you may find you've met more than your match in more than one of us....
|
|
|
Post by admin on Dec 2, 2007 22:45:48 GMT
If you can't work out who copied them make them members only to read so you can work it out Reluctantly, our beloved First Lady has made the interviews section "members only". The interviews section has been schumi's "baby" and although I've offered support, it wouldn't exist without her dedication and effort.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 2, 2007 23:10:13 GMT
I don't normally nominate these days, but I'm so pissed off I can't help myself. I'm sure some of you know that our interviews have been copied onto the Panthers' forum. At no time have I ever asked to be credited for the interviews - I just assumed it was common decency to quote the source. But not only have they copied them, they've also slagged off us and our members, and that just takes the biscuit. I've not asked for any form of recognition, but I've put a lot of time and effort into those interviews - doing research, emailing various people, and posing the questions (with a little help from others, at times) and to have it thrown back in my face like that has made me more angry than I thought possible. By all means use the interviews, but don't then go and slag us all off right after. Copyright exists on the internet just like anywhere else.....oh what poetic justice it would be to see a writ land on Pratley's desk, after all his threats of legal action. The action he's been threatening to take would need an extremely sympathetic or money grabbing lawyer to even take the case on - and then they'd have to convince the judge. Theft of copyright is so much easier to prove. Think about it, how good would that feel?? Get the screen shots before he gets wind of it - and Bob's your Uncle.
|
|