|
|
Post by zonkers on Apr 4, 2011 21:30:49 GMT
Wolverhampton Wolves = 42 1. Freddie Lindgren - 2 , 3 , F/X , 2 , 2 = 9 2. Ludvig Lindgren - 1' , 1 , 1 , 1 = 4+1 3. Tyron Proctor - 1' , 2 , 1' , F/X = 4+2 4. Tai Woffinden - 2 , 1' , 2, 3 = 8+1 5. Peter Karlsson - 3 , 3 , 6^ , 1' , 0 = 13+1 6. Tyson Burmiester - 0 , 0 , 1 , 1 = 2 7. Ricky Wells - 1 , 0 , 0 , 1 = 2 Poole Pirates = 51 1. Chris Holder - 3 , 3 , 2 , 3 , 3 = 14 2. Renat Gafurov - 0 , 0 , DA , 3 , 0 = 3 3. R/R for Darcy Ward - DA - 3 , DW - 1' , RG - 3, JD - 3 = 10+1 4. Jason Doyle - 0 , 2 , 2' , 3 , 2 = 9+1 5. Davey Watt - 2 , 2 , 1' , 3 , 0 , 1 = 9+1 6. Dennis Anderson - 3 , 3 , F , 3 , 0 , 2' = 11+1 7. Christian Hefenbrock - 2' , 1' , 2' , 0 = 5+3 Read more: speedwayupdates.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=Wolves&action=display&thread=7889&page=1#ixzz1IanEaytGPoor Freddie just tweeted this.... freddielindgren Fredrik Lindgren Very very very very angry!!!! Damn And who can blame him  |
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Apr 5, 2011 12:33:21 GMT
Poor Freddie just tweeted this.... freddielindgren Fredrik Lindgren Very very very very angry!!!! Damn And who can blame him Zonkers, it was Lindgren's fault, he kept on trying to go around somehwere where there wasn't room. The throttle does go both ways, he could have cut inside the mad Ruskie.  |
|
|
|
Post by zonkers on Apr 5, 2011 16:13:21 GMT
Poor Freddie just tweeted this.... freddielindgren Fredrik Lindgren Very very very very angry!!!! Damn And who can blame him Zonkers, it was Lindgren's fault, he kept on trying to go around somehwere where there wasn't room. The throttle does go both ways, he could have cut inside the mad Ruskie. I disagree....Gafurov came right across and pushed him so wide - have you watched the replay? I watched it over several times, and it was totally not Freddies fault. Should have been all four back IMO. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2011 18:08:28 GMT
Poor Freddie just tweeted this.... freddielindgren Fredrik Lindgren Very very very very angry!!!! Damn And who can blame him Zonkers, it was Lindgren's fault, he kept on trying to go around somehwere where there wasn't room. The throttle does go both ways, he could have cut inside the mad Ruskie. If it was Lindgren's fault the referee should also have excluded Gafurov who wasn't under power at the time of the stoppage. So, even if the referee got it right (which imo he didn't), he got it wrong if you follow my drift. And Genghis, is your view of the incident a little biased because Gafurov once rode for Oxford ?   |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2011 18:43:58 GMT
Zonkers, it was Lindgren's fault, he kept on trying to go around somehwere where there wasn't room. The throttle does go both ways, he could have cut inside the mad Ruskie. I disagree....Gafurov came right across and pushed him so wide - have you watched the replay? I watched it over several times, and it was totally not Freddies fault. Should have been all four back IMO. Sorry Genghis, I completely agree with Zonks. Should either have been Gafurov to go, or, more fairly in my opinion, should have been all 4 back. Most importantly though, we're seeing a lack of consistency already! Most refs would always give all 4 on a first bend incident like that. |
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Apr 6, 2011 12:22:25 GMT
Zonkers, it was Lindgren's fault, he kept on trying to go around somehwere where there wasn't room. The throttle does go both ways, he could have cut inside the mad Ruskie. If it was Lindgren's fault the referee should also have excluded Gafurov who wasn't under power at the time of the stoppage. So, even if the referee got it right (which imo he didn't), he got it wrong if you follow my drift. And Genghis, is your view of the incident a little biased because Gafurov once rode for Oxford ? Zonks, not really: he only made three appearances, demanded more money for his flights, and then buggered off.  It's just that Lindgren had a choice. And he made the wrong one. There was clearly no contact, Lindgren came off and then brought down the mad Ruskie in the process. Why should he get a second chance? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 18:43:01 GMT
If it was Lindgren's fault the referee should also have excluded Gafurov who wasn't under power at the time of the stoppage. So, even if the referee got it right (which imo he didn't), he got it wrong if you follow my drift. And Genghis, is your view of the incident a little biased because Gafurov once rode for Oxford ? Zonks, not really: he only made three appearances, demanded more money for his flights, and then buggered off. It's just that Lindgren had a choice. And he made the wrong one. There was clearly no contact, Lindgren came off and then brought down the mad Ruskie in the process. Why should he get a second chance? Why are you addressing me as Zonks when you reply to my posts ?  |
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Apr 7, 2011 11:52:15 GMT
Zonks, not really: he only made three appearances, demanded more money for his flights, and then buggered off. It's just that Lindgren had a choice. And he made the wrong one. There was clearly no contact, Lindgren came off and then brought down the mad Ruskie in the process. Why should he get a second chance? Why are you addressing me as Zonks when you reply to my posts ? It must be that false wig |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2011 17:14:07 GMT
Why are you addressing me as Zonks when you reply to my posts ? It must be that false wig No......I'm sure she doesn't wear a wig !!   |
|
