|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 10, 2010 18:13:34 GMT
Surely the "after the first bend someone has to be excluded as the cause of the stoppage" rule has to go?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2010 18:18:21 GMT
Surely the "after the first bend someone has to be excluded as the cause of the stoppage" rule has to go? Sorry Schumster, but Pedersen!! what a wanker, Andersen left him plenty of room, and could have done to him what Pedersen did to Watt. Andersen was totally fair.. |
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 10, 2010 18:34:19 GMT
But I don't think Watt deserved to go...but neither did Nicki. However there have been better examples this year as to why the rule should at least be amended.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2010 18:43:53 GMT
But I don't think Watt deserved to go...but neither did Nicki. However there have been better examples this year as to why the rule should at least be amended. If the rule is amended, the restart should be handicapped so the leader(is this case Andersen) is not penalized for what happens behind him. |
|
