|
Post by zonkers on Oct 10, 2009 20:09:42 GMT
Rye House = 50
1. Chris Neath...............2*,3,0,3,3 = 11+1 2. Edward Kennett..........3,1,2,3,1 = 10 3. Joe Haines.................0,3,3,3 = 9 4. Luke Bowen...............1,2*,2*,3 = 8+2 5. Linus Sundstrom...... 3,0,0,0 = 3 6. Kyle Hughes...............0,1,1,2* = 4+1 7. Josh Auty...................3,1,1*,X = 5+1
Lakeside = 40
1. Jonas Kylmakorpi...........1,1,3,3,1*,2 = 11+1 2. Jordan Frampton............0,3,0,3,2*,0 = 8+1 3. RR 4. Paul Hurry ....................2*,2*,2,2,1 = 9+1 5. Stuart Robson ..............2,2,1,1*,2 = 8+1 6. Jamie Courtney...............2,0,0,1* = 3+1 7. Jerran Hart.....................1*,0,0,0 = 1+1
(From updates)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2009 20:18:41 GMT
2. Edward Kennett..........3,1,2,3,1 = 10 west ham 1. Jonas Kylmakorpi...........1,1,3,3,1*,2 = 11+1 2. Jordan Frampton............0,3,0,3,2*,0 = 8+1 3. RR 4. Paul Hurry ....................2*,2*,2,2,1 = 9+1 5. Stuart Robson ..............2,2,1,1*,2 = 8+1 6. Jamie Courtney...............2,0,0,1* = 3+1 7. Jerran Hart.....................1*,0,0,0 = 1+1 Or to put it another way, clearly not Rye House Vs west ham..................................What a complete and utter FUCKING FARCE........
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2009 20:49:44 GMT
Does anyone know why Kauko Nieminen wasn't riding tonight?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2009 21:00:23 GMT
Does anyone know why Kauko Nieminen wasn't riding tonight? Presumably because if he had west ham would have won and made the second leg null and void, or to put it another way to take the complete and utter piss out of the paying punter.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2009 21:46:00 GMT
Does anyone know why Kauko Nieminen wasn't riding tonight? Presumably because if he had west ham would have won and made the second leg null and void, or to put it another way to take the complete and utter piss out of the paying punter. You never have been too good with the facts surrounding Lakeside have you ..........there is no second leg........this was a one-off.......so your conspiracy theory bites the dust once more.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Oct 10, 2009 21:57:54 GMT
Does anyone know why Kauko Nieminen wasn't riding tonight? To save himself from embarrassment?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2009 22:13:23 GMT
Presumably because if he had west ham would have won and made the second leg null and void, or to put it another way to take the complete and utter piss out of the paying punter. You never have been too good with the facts surrounding Lakeside have you ..........there is no second leg........this was a one-off.......so your conspiracy theory bites the dust once more. potato, pot-a-to............. west ham(like Poole) still sent a derisory team for a completely meaningless fixture.
|
|
|
Post by zonkers on Oct 10, 2009 22:13:51 GMT
Does anyone know why Kauko Nieminen wasn't riding tonight? To save himself from embarrassment? There's no info anywhere on why he didn't ride......
|
|