|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 13:56:22 GMT
Yes, the Czech Republic would beat Great Britain at the EOES, make no mistake. Hatcham - I'm not so sure regarding the Russians. I think they could beat us at Leszno. What absolute bollocks Genghis, Czech Republic would have no chance of beating GB at Peterborough, as for the Russians they are clearly an re-emerging nation and look likely to surpass Team GB before long, but not this season, and they definitely won't beat US at Leszno, it's possible they might beat YOU but not US, as i don't support any team, domestic or international. Hatcham - you're British, so it's "us". And we'll see what happens this season - I still think we're struggle to beat the Russians at Leszno. And the the Czechs would have beaten us at the EOES. Thank goodness the draw means we don't have to face them there - if they could push us at Coventry (with one Dryml failing to score and the other not riding), we'd have been easy meat for them on a track which suits the Dryml brothers down to the ground.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 13:59:58 GMT
The Czech's would have posed absolutely no problems to Team GB at the EoES, Sub, they are poor, even by GB standards They gave Great Britain a hard time at Coventry last season and that was without Ales Dryml scoring a point. The EoES is home territory for both the Drymls. They'd have been a threat, if you're too addled to see that, well, not my problem. Lukas (the best of the Dryml's) recent form there is not even up to the standard of Danny King, who would not even make the GB side. What does 2002 have to do with now ? you might as well list GB and Polish teams from 1975, and claim the Poles have no chance of beating Britain
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 14:00:28 GMT
Half decent side ? no Loram, no Nicholls, no Louis, we had Richardson, a washed up Havelock a past his best Screen and two div 2 riders, how the fuck is that half decent It's still better than what we had last year. Remember Stonehewer did OK during his three-year GP stint and actually got in and stayed in on merit, which is more than you say about our current representatives.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 14:01:49 GMT
What absolute bollocks Genghis, Czech Republic would have no chance of beating GB at Peterborough, as for the Russians they are clearly an re-emerging nation and look likely to surpass Team GB before long, but not this season, and they definitely won't beat US at Leszno, it's possible they might beat YOU but not US, as i don't support any team, domestic or international. Hatcham - you're British, so it's "us". And we'll see what happens this season - I still think we're struggle to beat the Russians at Leszno. And the the Czechs would have beaten us at the EOES. Thank goodness the draw means we don't have to face them there - if they could push us at Coventry (with one Dryml failing to score and the other not riding), we'd have been easy meat for them on a track which suits the Dryml brothers down to the ground. Then why did Peterborough do fuck all with the GP star who is suited down to the ground with the track riding at number 2 ? Oh and you might be British but it cuts no ice with me.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 8, 2009 14:04:54 GMT
Lukas (the best of the Dryml's) recent form there is not even up to the standard of Danny King, who would not even make the GB side. Evidence suggests that while riders from other countries raise their game when donning the national flag for the SWC, British riders sink like a stone. Remember that Great Britain fielded five so-called "Brandon experts" for the SWC at Coventry last year and managed just a single race winner in twenty-five heats. I don't say that the Czechs would've beaten Great Britain, all I say is that it would've been a lot tougher than it's likely to be with a no-hoper side. And Daniel King could quite easily make the Great Britain side for the EoES meeting.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 14:06:28 GMT
They gave Great Britain a hard time at Coventry last season and that was without Ales Dryml scoring a point. The EoES is home territory for both the Drymls. They'd have been a threat, if you're too addled to see that, well, not my problem. Lukas (the best of the Dryml's) recent form there is not even up to the standard of Danny King, who would not even make the GB side. What does 2002 have to do with now ? you might as well list GB and Polish teams from 1975, and claim the Poles have no chance of beating Britain Hatcham - OK, look at LAST year's round at Coventry, add in what the Dryml STILL score around the EOES (throughout their career, they have both scored freely around the EOES, even at times when their form elsewhere hasn't been good) and maybe then you can see what I'm saying. Bloody hell, I thought I could be stubborn, but you take the fucking biscuit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 14:07:47 GMT
Half decent side ? no Loram, no Nicholls, no Louis, we had Richardson, a washed up Havelock a past his best Screen and two div 2 riders, how the fuck is that half decent It's still better than what we had last year. Remember Stonehewer did OK during his three-year GP stint and actually got in and stayed in on merit, which is more than you say about our current representatives. But Nicholls and possibly Harris DO get in on merit Genghis, the fault lies with the BSI, or whatever they call themselves for not being open and transparent with the qualification regulations.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 8, 2009 14:08:11 GMT
Half decent side ? no Loram, no Nicholls, no Louis, we had Richardson, a washed up Havelock a past his best Screen and two div 2 riders, how the fuck is that half decent What's with this "we had"? I thought you didn't support a team, but now you're saying "we had". Make your mind up, will you?
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 14:09:01 GMT
Oh and you might be British but it cuts no ice with me. You are British.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 14:11:29 GMT
It's still better than what we had last year. Remember Stonehewer did OK during his three-year GP stint and actually got in and stayed in on merit, which is more than you say about our current representatives. But Nicholls and possibly Harris DO get in on merit Genghis, the fault lies with the BSI, or whatever they call themselves for not being open and transparent with the qualification regulations. Hatcham - my definition is that the top eight from last year's series, plus the top three from Zielona Gora, are there on merit. The four seeded riders have not qualified as such and are charity cases.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 14:11:44 GMT
Lukas (the best of the Dryml's) recent form there is not even up to the standard of Danny King, who would not even make the GB side. Evidence suggests that while riders from other countries raise their game when donning the national falg for the SWC, British riders sink like a stone. Remember that Great Britain fielded five so-called "Brandon experts" for the SWC at Coventry last year and managed just a single race winner in twenty-five heats. I don't say that the Czechs would've beaten Great Britain, all I say is that it would've been a lot tougher than it's likely to be with a no-hoper side. And Daniel King could quite easily make the Great Britain side for the EoES meeting. Typo's are easy to make Sub, i mistakenly typed 'we' just like you mistakenly typed FALG
|
|
|
Post by admin on Feb 8, 2009 14:13:53 GMT
Typo's are easy to make Sub, i mistakenly typed 'we' just like you mistakenly typed FALG So, you meant to type "ew"? After all, in mine the right letters are there, just in the wrong order.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 14:14:09 GMT
Half decent side ? no Loram, no Nicholls, no Louis, we had Richardson, a washed up Havelock a past his best Screen and two div 2 riders, how the fuck is that half decent What's with this "we had"? I thought you didn't support a team, but now you're saying "we had". Make your mind up, will you? If the team was called what it is, ENGLAND, they would be my team, but their not so their not.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2009 14:16:31 GMT
Oh and you might be British but it cuts no ice with me. You are British. It's true being English makes me British, it also makes me European, so as a European, i choose to support Poland this year, and supported Denmark last
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Feb 8, 2009 14:19:23 GMT
You are British. It's true being English makes me British, it also makes me European, so as a European, i choose to support Poland this year, and supported Denmark last Whatever. You're still British.
|
|