Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:28:05 GMT
What bullshit is that about result from Heat 15....take it from Heat 19, that's bullshit.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 19, 2009 11:34:14 GMT
What bullshit is that about result from Heat 15....take it from Heat 19, that's bullshit. Have to take the result after each block of five races. That's the rules. So, if they race Ht 20 and then stop, the result from Ht 20 will count.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:34:40 GMT
It's always been the case in the SWC harry - the result will only stand after heat 15 and will go back to 15 if end of 20 is not completed and 20 if 25 is not completed. It's to ensure that each rider has had the same number of programmed rides.
Rico
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:37:38 GMT
It's always been the case in the SWC harry - the result will only stand after heat 15 and will go back to 15 if end of 20 is not completed and 20 if 25 is not completed. It's to ensure that each rider has had the same number of programmed rides. Rico It seems fair to me. You have to fancy the Aussies from here, but with Batchelor having 2 rides left and Watt 1, it only takes an E/F from Crump or Adams to throw this wide open, with that in mind Australia's current price of 1/33 looks absolutely barmy.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 19, 2009 11:40:33 GMT
It's always been the case in the SWC harry - the result will only stand after heat 15 and will go back to 15 if end of 20 is not completed and 20 if 25 is not completed. It's to ensure that each rider has had the same number of programmed rides. Apart from when the result was called incorrectly in the 2002 race-off.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 19, 2009 11:40:51 GMT
It's logical. You wouldn't call the result of an individual meeting after 14 heats when eight riders haven't ridden four times and you could have someone on a 9 point maximum losing out to someone with 10 points from four rides.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 19, 2009 11:42:50 GMT
Hatcham, what are the odds on Poland? They've got 4 inside gates in 6 races. Even with that numpty Cieslak in charge (was wasn't Hampel out in place of Miedzinski ), I still fancy them to pull it out of the fire.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jul 19, 2009 11:43:44 GMT
Meanwhile, elsewhere, the Ekstraliga meeting between Czestochowa and Wroclaw has been postponed, so the global superstar has traveled to Poland for nothing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:45:12 GMT
It's logical. You wouldn't call the result of an individual meeting after 14 heats when eight riders haven't ridden four times and you could have someone on a 9 point maximum losing out to someone with 10 points from four rides. Well you could say that some teams have used a joker while other teams have not ....plus some have had a better gates etc etc where do you stop .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:46:12 GMT
Aussies don't look up for this. Hurrah Rico
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:47:10 GMT
Apart from when the result was called incorrectly in the 2002 race-off. Can you remind us what happened then please Genghis. Rico
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:47:57 GMT
Hatcham, what are the odds on Poland? They've got 4 inside gates in 6 races. Even with that numpty Cieslak in charge (was wasn't Hampel out in place of Miedzinski ), I still fancy them to pull it out of the fire. 5/1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:50:53 GMT
Where's Ronnie Russell when you need him ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2009 11:57:14 GMT
Meanwhile, elsewhere, the Ekstraliga meeting between Czestochowa and Wroclaw has been postponed, so the global superstar has traveled to Poland for nothing. Not if he shags Charlie later it won't be ;D
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 19, 2009 11:57:48 GMT
Well, I'm bored of waiting - I'm having me beans on toast.
|
|