Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 20:32:10 GMT
Swidon went into the match knowing they were allowed to track there side by the people who run the sport . So Swindon can break the rules because the President of the BSPA says so. Didn't they allow Oxford to break the rules recently and allow them to use a rider on an average without bonus points when he should have been signed on an average including bonus points according to the rules?
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 5, 2008 20:34:51 GMT
Freddie Eriksson, wasn't it? And then there was Todd's reduction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 20:39:23 GMT
Freddie Eriksson, wasn't it? And then there was Todd's reduction. Absolutely. May as well have torn the rule book up there and then if Oxford were going to be allowed to break them willy-nilly. Or, maybe the SCB just applied rule 3.1.1.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 5, 2008 21:02:15 GMT
So Swindon can break the rules because the President of the BSPA says so. Didn't they allow Oxford to break the rules recently and allow them to use a rider on an average without bonus points when he should have been signed on an average including bonus points according to the rules? Grachan, is that the best you can manage - to bring up ancient history from 2006? Swindon have broken the rules THIS season.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 21:07:26 GMT
Didn't they allow Oxford to break the rules recently and allow them to use a rider on an average without bonus points when he should have been signed on an average including bonus points according to the rules? Grachan, is that the best you can manage - to bring up ancient history from 2006? Swindon have broken the rules THIS season. The point I'm making is that if you are so outraged about this episode then presumably you would have been equally outraged about that episode. I bet you weren't though. And Swindon haven't broken the rules any more than Oxford did then. They were given permission to use said rider on each occasion by the very people who make the rules including the one about it being up to them how they interpret them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 21:15:58 GMT
Well if we are bringing up rule breaking in the past then, how come we weren't allowed to have Pepe on his average without bonus points in 2005/6 then, when everyone knows that all other riders averages were without .....oh yes that's right because it was Ipswich Witches that's why
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 5, 2008 21:20:16 GMT
Well if we are bringing up rule breaking in the past then, how come we weren't allowed to have Pepe on his average without bonus points in 2005/6 then, when everyone knows that all other riders averages were without .....oh yes that's right because it was Ipswich Witches that's why Badge - however you were allowed to fiddle Hampel in on a 6.27 this season, when the rule book suggested it should be 8.00
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2008 22:36:55 GMT
Well if we are bringing up rule breaking in the past then, how come we weren't allowed to have Pepe on his average without bonus points in 2005/6 then, when everyone knows that all other riders averages were without .....oh yes that's right because it was Ipswich Witches that's why Badge - however you were allowed to fiddle Hampel in on a 6.27 this season, when the rule book suggested it should be 8.00 No actually genghis, no fiddle, we thought he would be on 8 but the powers that be said 6.27.....for once we didn't argue
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2008 21:59:35 GMT
think its already been done (or almost) and according to Pete somewhat of a surprise choice! When/Where did Pete say this Gavin?? Wonder what he means by surprise choice I've been thinking about this and have concluded the new signing is one of the following:- Tomasz Gollob Nicki Pedersen Ryan Sullivan Well they have said it will be a surprise.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2008 22:14:39 GMT
When/Where did Pete say this Gavin?? Wonder what he means by surprise choice I've been thinking about this and have concluded the new signing is one of the following:- Tomasz Gollob Nicki Pedersen Ryan Sullivan Well they have said it will be a surprise. But they would be nice surprises Kev, we don't get those at Foxhall these days we get the other kind
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2008 22:30:12 GMT
I've been thinking about this and have concluded the new signing is one of the following:- Tomasz Gollob Nicki Pedersen Ryan Sullivan Well they have said it will be a surprise. But they would be nice surprises Kev, we don't get those at Foxhall these days we get the other kind ;D You'd better brace yourselves for Jesper B Jen Monberg then.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 7, 2008 5:55:48 GMT
But they would be nice surprises Kev, we don't get those at Foxhall these days we get the other kind ;D You'd better brace yourselves for Jesper B Jen Monberg then. Jesper B Jen Monberg. Now isn't that the rider that Schumi claimed had totally lost his form, as opposed to reducing his average at both Oxford and Ipswich, which is what both the Cheetahs and Witches fans suspected. But then he finished second in the GP qualifying semi-final. Looks like he can perform when he WANTS to, Schumi!
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 7, 2008 6:08:05 GMT
Jesper B Jen Monberg. Now isn't that the rider that Schumi claimed had totally lost his form, as opposed to reducing his average at both Oxford and Ipswich, which is what both the Cheetahs and Witches fans suspected. But then he finished second in the GP qualifying semi-final. Looks like he can perform when he WANTS to, Schumi! No I didn't. I said he'd lost his confidence. And as for the final, he was hardly up against mind-blowing opposition, was he? Resisting the temptation to mention the "D" word.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Jul 7, 2008 11:13:35 GMT
Jesper B Jen Monberg. Now isn't that the rider that Schumi claimed had totally lost his form, as opposed to reducing his average at both Oxford and Ipswich, which is what both the Cheetahs and Witches fans suspected. But then he finished second in the GP qualifying semi-final. Looks like he can perform when he WANTS to, Schumi! No I didn't. I said he'd lost his confidence. And as for the final, he was hardly up against mind-blowing opposition, was he? Resisting the temptation to mention the "D" word. Schumi, it was a top line-up, look at the quality of some of the non-qualifiers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2008 14:29:05 GMT
But they would be nice surprises Kev, we don't get those at Foxhall these days we get the other kind ;D You'd better brace yourselves for Jesper B Jen Monberg then. That's one I'm fairly certain won't be a Witch TBH, well along with Tomasz, it'll probably be Marcin Rempala or Jan Jaros Don't know how long we can wait for Hans to drop his average sufficiently
|
|