|
Post by schumi on Apr 24, 2008 18:42:15 GMT
I saw an article in the Speedway Star today where Mads Korneliussen refers to his exclusion after his collision with Chris Harris. He's calling for a second referee - well, I can see why in his case, but wouldn't that lead to plenty of scope for argument? And do we really need two?
As an aside, is it me, or did he call Chris Harris blind?
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 24, 2008 18:50:19 GMT
I don't really see the point of having two referees, to be honest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2008 19:01:35 GMT
With some of the referees 1 is too many.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2008 19:17:00 GMT
I don't really see the point of having two referees, to be honest. Unless they are both given a microphone and their conversations are broadcast to the crowd ;D that could add considerably to the entertainment value
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2008 21:27:46 GMT
Bugger - I thought this was going to one of those joke threads. You know- how many referees does it take to....etc.
|
|
|
Post by marron on Apr 24, 2008 22:49:09 GMT
I reckon a ref is needed on either or both the 1st/2nd bend and 3rd/4th bend.
The communication would need to be sorted, as to who has control of the buttons when a race needs to be stopped but having a ref on the bends will provide a better view when it comes to exclusions.
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Mar 1, 2009 17:42:46 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2009 18:46:13 GMT
Three referees. On in the tower on the starting line, and one in the middle of each bend. If an incident happens on bend 1-2 that referee has absolute power. Same goes for the ref on bend 3-4. Everything else is for the head ref in the tower. Maybe?
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Mar 1, 2009 18:59:21 GMT
I would stick with one ref. Yes, he's going to make the odd howler, but a bit of controversy, every now and then, is good.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 1, 2009 19:33:52 GMT
I would stick with one ref. Yes, he's going to make the odd howler, but a bit of controversy, every now and then, is good. As long as it's not the golem Flint.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Mar 1, 2009 19:40:22 GMT
I would stick with one ref. Yes, he's going to make the odd howler, but a bit of controversy, every now and then, is good. As long as it's not the golem Flint. Well, I wouldn't describe him as a referee in the first place. He's the Simply Red of his particular field.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 1, 2009 19:52:30 GMT
Well, I wouldn't describe him as a referee in the first place. He's the Paul McCartney of his particular field. Can't argue with that sentiment, now that I've edited it to read what you no doubt meant it to read.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Mar 1, 2009 20:24:23 GMT
Well, I wouldn't describe him as a referee in the first place. He's the Paul McCartney of his particular field. Can't argue with that sentiment, now that I've edited it to read what you no doubt meant it to read. Er, no I didn't mean that. Don't you dare compare Mick Bloody Hucknall to the man who crafted such beautiful songs as "Eleanor Rigby", "Hey Jude" and "Got To Get You Into My Life"
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Mar 1, 2009 20:26:55 GMT
Don't you dare compare Mick Bloody Hucknall to the man who crafted such beautiful songs as "Eleanor Rigby", "Hey Jude" and "Got To Get You Into My Life" And the Frog Chorus? Got to agree with you, though. Can't stand Simply Red, especially Fairground.
|
|
|
Post by Genghis on Mar 1, 2009 20:31:26 GMT
Can't stand Simply Red, especially Fairground. Yep, that one is annoyingly bloody awful as well. In fact, did Simply Red ever do anything that wasn't complete shite?
|
|