|
Post by schumi on Feb 7, 2008 23:13:57 GMT
Just moving the calendar overnight, in case anyone wonders where it's gone.
|
|
|
Post by braveheart on Feb 7, 2008 23:17:42 GMT
Just moving the calendar overnight, in case anyone wonders where it's gone. yeh, where's it gone as I would like team by team ?
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Feb 7, 2008 23:23:18 GMT
It's hidden for now. Which team?
|
|
|
Post by braveheart on Feb 7, 2008 23:29:17 GMT
Glasgow Reading Somerset Birmingham Not Rye House, because that means I'm bored ;D
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Feb 7, 2008 23:29:54 GMT
I'll do my best.
|
|
|
Post by braveheart on Feb 7, 2008 23:33:26 GMT
Thanks Schumi. Looking forward to seeing their fixtures on the Weird World by 0905hrs tomorrow
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Feb 7, 2008 23:38:44 GMT
I'll release March's fixtures just after 8 (hopefully.)
|
|
|
Post by braveheart on Feb 7, 2008 23:44:20 GMT
I'll release March's fixtures just after 8 (hopefully.) Blimey, you must have a good source of information
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 11:30:51 GMT
I've been wondering for a while now, why Norbold doesn't post here anymore? Yet we still have the Politics section dedicated to him when he doesn't even contribute to that...What do you think about moving the Interviews section up to where that is, as it's much more prominent, where people will notice it easier, it is after all on of the best bits of the forum?
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 2, 2008 14:47:45 GMT
I think we may be a little too coarse for young norbold, but I'm interested in politics (didn't William Hague leave poor Harriet Harman for roadkill in the Commons this afternoon?), so that sections stays, but I've moved the interviews into the same area of the forum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 15:18:31 GMT
He certainly did Sub, for a minute or two anyway, but somebody clearly wrote a very clever retort for her to use. It's not that I'm not interested in it Sub,I just don't think it should be attributed to someone who doesn't contribute to the forum.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 2, 2008 15:58:29 GMT
He certainly did Sub, for a minute or two anyway, but somebody clearly wrote a very clever retort for her to use. But the poor dear was obviously in way over her head - she was embarrassingly inept.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 16:18:15 GMT
But the poor dear was obviously in way over her head - she was embarrassingly inept. She didnae have her stab vest on then . ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2008 16:23:37 GMT
He certainly did Sub, for a minute or two anyway, but somebody clearly wrote a very clever retort for her to use. It's not that I'm not interested in it Sub,I just don't think it should be attributed to someone who doesn't contribute to the forum. Ther youare then Jacques, isn't that nice of them, it's now attributed to the wibbly one.
|
|
|
Post by admin on Apr 2, 2008 16:30:44 GMT
She didnae have her stab vest on then . ;D Don't know if you heard it, but that was one of the little jabs Hague had. He said something along the lines of "tailors her attire to the occasion - a hard hat on a building site, Indian clothes for some areas of her constituency and presumably a clown's outfit to cabinet meetings".
|
|