Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 16:44:08 GMT
well you've done it my posts, why not his? ;D he wwas saying Dickhead I think
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 16:44:48 GMT
What did they say x 2?
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jun 24, 2007 16:47:45 GMT
well you've done it my posts, why not his? ;D he wwas saying Dickhead I think I'll go and do it now - was torn between dickhead and dumbfuck. But if you say it was dickhead, dickhead it will be.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 16:49:21 GMT
I hadn't considered the second one....... ;D
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 16:51:27 GMT
Bow to the almighty Subedei
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jun 24, 2007 16:53:11 GMT
Anyway, the guy at the BSF got a ban for saying something along the lines of he wouldn't be troubled if Greg Hancock broke a leg at Cardiff. He was annoyed at the preceived actions of Hancock (rightly, in my view), but went a little too far with his post to the BSF.
|
|
|
Post by stuartroad on Jun 24, 2007 16:53:32 GMT
well you've done it my posts, why not his? ;D he wwas saying Dickhead I think I'll go and do it now - was torn between dickhead and dumbfuck. But if you say it was dickhead, dickhead it will be. my point is i actually posted d*******,and it still got me a yellow card. the word i wanted to call him,didn't even begin with d,but as schumi doesn't like gratuitous language,i'll leave it to your imagination.
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jun 24, 2007 16:58:03 GMT
That's not gratuitous - it's factual. Feel free.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 17:00:28 GMT
That's not gratuitous - it's factual. Feel free. erm I'll stab a guess at Fuckwit? ;D
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jun 24, 2007 17:07:58 GMT
Well, we're getting a little away from the point at the minute. I don't mind. But young road wants a sensible discussion on censorship. I agree with the fellow, the best way to confront such things as ignorance and bigotry, is to let them have their say and then tear their views to pieces with logical arguments. But to many at the BSF aren't capable of logical argument. Personally, I think flapperjack was what road truly wanted to write.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 17:15:48 GMT
Personally, I think flapperjack was what road truly wanted to write. Now you all know the only banned word on here is flapperjack but can you guess it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 17:18:30 GMT
Thats one of the things I find incredibly frustrating when certain individuals ( the same one's all the time incidently) go on there, ranting and raving without the ability to debate and just end up throwing obsceneties because thats all they know how to do.....but you are never going to stop that..I often think to myself that, if it was a face to face discussion they would run and hide..the other point going back to KC to PC's post...you also find that things are said and misconstrued because it's on the computer and not face to face.
Another issue of course what offends one person wouldn't necessarily offend another........
|
|
|
Post by stuartroad on Jun 24, 2007 17:19:07 GMT
Personally, I think flapperjack was what road truly wanted to write. Now you all know the only banned word on here is flapperjacks but can you guess it? the flap bit kind of gives it away
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 24, 2007 17:30:11 GMT
for me it's the sheer presence of a certain individual that pisses over every possible thread, that gets my hackles up...grrrrrrrrrr
|
|
|
Post by admin on Jun 24, 2007 17:31:39 GMT
for me it's the sheer presence of a certain individual that pisses over every possible thread, that gets my hackles up...grrrrrrrrrr And I thought you liked me?
|
|