Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2010 21:26:56 GMT
Thoughts on Robbo's exclusion? I blame Klindt. Cut right across Robbo and Wethers coming off bend 2 getting them all out of shape. Still think there's a case for not excluding a rider when an incident occurs. Heats 1&3 spring to mind there, those decisions could've gone either way. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2010 6:38:40 GMT
With Schlein heading to Peterborough. Why the hell would Peterborough sign Schlein... he's shite.  That say's a lot about Bridger this year then! Still think there's a case for not excluding a rider when an incident occurs. Heats 1&3 spring to mind there, those decisions could've gone either way. Having to exclude someone after the first turn because the race is stopped is just an addition to the list of stupid speedway rules. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2010 19:51:40 GMT
Thoughts on Robbo's exclusion? I blame Klindt. Cut right across Robbo and Wethers coming off bend 2 getting them all out of shape. Still think there's a case for not excluding a rider when an incident occurs. Heats 1&3 spring to mind there, those decisions could've gone either way. I agree with both points Youngy. Both decisions were 50/50 and if the ref had been allowed to put all 4 back it would have been fairer. It might also help refs to be more consistent! |
|
