|
Post by schumi on Jul 5, 2009 22:06:42 GMT
Piraterna versus Dackarna
Piraterna..40 [83]
1..J Davidsson 2..R Dobrucki 3..E Sajfutdinov 4..A Lindback 5..D Balinski 6..L Sundstrom 7..R Kosciecha 8..D Ekstrand
Dackarna..50 [103]
1..A Jonsson 2..R Schlein 3..F Lindgren 4..P Karlsson 5..H Andersen 6..L Lindgren 7..N Klindt 8..T Gudmundsson
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 5, 2009 22:07:07 GMT
Indianerna versus Lejonen
Indianerna..46 [89]
1..G Walasek 2..M Ferjan 3..P Protasiewicz 4..J B Monberg 5..R Holta 6..S Gustafsson 7..L Madsen 8..D Rohlen
Lejonen..50 [103]
1..N Pedersen 2..P Swiderski 3..D Ruud 4..C Holder 5..D Watt 6..D Andersson 7..R Kling 8..NRN
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 5, 2009 22:08:41 GMT
Rospiggarna versus Vargarna
Rospiggarna..43 [81] 1..G Hancock 2..H Gustafsson 3..J Kolodziej 4..T McGowan 5..R Sullivan 6..J Messing 7..M Janowski 8..R Burestad
Vargarna..53 [111]
1..A Miedzinski 2..E Kennett 3..S Nicholls 4..A Skornicki 5..A Shields 6..T Woffinden 7..K Nilsson 8..J Andersson
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 6, 2009 10:07:17 GMT
Team..Played..Won..Drawn..Lost..For-Against..Bonus..Points
1..Vetlanda..9..6..2..1..478-386..1..15 2..Vastervik..8..5..2..1..405-363..0..12 3..Dackarna..8..5..2..1..380-364..0..12 4..Indianerna..9..5..0..4..449-415..1..11 5..Smederna..9..3..1..5..417-447..1..8 6..Lejonen..9..3..1..5..418-422..0..7 7..Piraterna..9..3..0..6..428-435..1..7 8..Vargarna..8..2..1..5..360-407..0..5 9..Rospiggarna..9..2..1..6..384-480..0..5
So round 11, and Vastervik's turn to take a break, which means Dackarna can move up to second place in the table if they take any points at Motala.
The Pirates will be hoping to take advantage of Smederna's likely defeat at Vetlanda (should they ride) to move up themselves, although how many places they can rise depends on whether Lejonen can defeat Indianerna, or at least take the bonus point. Piraterna have the Russian wonderkid riding this week, so Kosciecha drops to reserve, giving them some much needed strength in the bottom end.
Indianerna have replaced Joonas Kylmakorpi with Matej Ferjan for this round, as the two Eastbourne reserves meet on opposing teams. This is the hardest meeting to predict, as Lejonen haven't been performing at all well this season, having only won three of their nine meetings so far. On paper they should be stronger, but the Indians now seem to be riding well as a team and have the in-form Leon Madsen partnering Simon Gustafsson at reserve. But with Lejonen taking a ten point lead to Kumla, it could go either way for the bonus.
Smederna, as anticipated, didn't carry out their threat to drop Krzysztof Kasprzak, despite him only scoring six points last week. The team have replaced Buczkowski with Danny King, but Robert Miskowiak scored 16 points at Swindon for Ipswich last week and, for me, would have easily been the better choice. However, I suspect that with the current situation, and the chances of a win very slim, the team are looking to save money where they can, opting for the cheaper Brit as opposed to the more expensive Pole.
Edit: This meeting has now been cancelled.
Rospiggarna, however, will stay bottom of the table, as Vargarna have a healthy lead on aggregate, and should take at least one point from their meeting. The Wolves have dropped Joe Screen, who has been underperforming, and replaced him with Edward Kennett, and Rospiggarna are missing the injured Sebastian Ulamek, meaning McGowan moves up, and Janowski comes in at reserve to partner Jonas Messing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2009 10:34:52 GMT
i am certain that Smederna will drop out with immediate effect following the bankruptcy.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2009 19:08:21 GMT
I have herd bad news about smaderna team gone to the wall ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2009 19:09:19 GMT
Smederna
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2009 19:11:28 GMT
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 6, 2009 19:18:32 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 6, 2009 19:32:09 GMT
thanks ghostwalker
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2009 13:01:19 GMT
Rospiggarna, however, will stay bottom of the table, as Vargarna have a healthy lead on aggregate, and should take at least one point from their meeting. What sort of arithmetics is that Schumi? If Rospiggarna win, they'll stand on seven and Vargarna will only have six should they claim the bonus point.
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 7, 2009 14:26:07 GMT
Rospiggarna, however, will stay bottom of the table, as Vargarna have a healthy lead on aggregate, and should take at least one point from their meeting. What sort of arithmetics is that Schumi? If Rospiggarna win, they'll stand on seven and Vargarna will only have six should they claim the bonus point. Oops. Could I ask a favour while I'm here? If I'm not around when tonight's meeting begins (which is likely), can someone post links to each one please?
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 7, 2009 15:47:44 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2009 16:53:10 GMT
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jul 7, 2009 19:21:37 GMT
Rospiggarna, however, will stay bottom of the table, as Vargarna have a healthy lead on aggregate, and should take at least one point from their meeting. What sort of arithmetics is that Schumi? If Rospiggarna win, they'll stand on seven and Vargarna will only have six should they claim the bonus point. Turns out I was right though.
|
|