Wolverhampton versus Ipswich - 19-05-08

[admin]

This week sees the Sky cameras returning to Wolverhampton, who become the first club to have a return visit this season. And we can but hope that this meeting is better than the first, which saw Lakeside record an away win in a dreary encounter.
It's been a difficult start to the season for the Wolves, with most of their riders being a bit "hit and miss", while is probably an apt description for Ipswich's season as well. The Witches have done better than I expected, but they lost their only Sky meeting so far this season at home to Swindon.
And the Witches will be in good spirits following home and away victories over Eastbourne last week. But I suspect that Wolverhampton will edge this.

[admin]

Wolverhampton versus Ipswich

Wolverhampton..43

1..F Lindgren..1,2,3,4,3,3 = 16
2..A Dryml..3,0,1,0 = 4
3..N-K Iversen..2',0,1,1',2' = 6+3
4..N Klindt..3,0,0,0 = 3
5..D Howe..3,3,0,1 = 7
6..C Hefenbrock..2,1,0,2 = 5
7..K Hansen..1',0,1 = 2+1

Ipswich..48

1..E Kennett..2,3,2',0,0 = 7+1
2..R Miskowiak..0,2',3,3,1 = 9+1
3..T Kroner..1,1',1',0 = 3+2
4..S Johnston..0,2,2,W = 4
5..J Hampel..2,3,3,2 = 10
6..P Swiderski..3,0,1,2',3,3 = 12+1
7..C Schramm..0,2',1 = 3+1

Ht 1..Dryml, Kennett, Lindgren, Miskowiak 4-2 (4-2)
Ht 2..Swiderski, Hefenbrock, Hansen, Schramm [E/F] 3-3 (7-5)
Ht 3..Klindt, Iversen, Kroner, Johnston [E/F] 5-1 (12-6)
Ht 4..Howe, Hampel, Hefenbrock, Swiderski 4-2 (16-8)
Ht 5..Kennett, Miskowiak, Iversen [Ex], Klindt [F/Ex] 0-5 (16-13)
Ht 6..Hampel, Lindgren, Swiderski, Dryml 2-4 (18-17)
Ht 7..Howe, Johnston, Kroner, Hefenbrock 3-3 (21-20)
Ht 8..Miskowiak, Schramm, Dryml, Hansen 1-5 (22-25)
Ht 9..Hampel, Swiderski, Iversen, Klindt 1-5 (23-30)
Ht 10..Lindgren, Johnston, Kroner, Dryml [Ex] 3-3 (26-33)
Ht 11..Miskowiak, Kennett, Hansen, Howe [E/F] 1-5 (27-38)
Ht 12..Swiderski, Lindgren [T/S], Iversen, Kroner 5-3 (32-41)
Ht 13..Lindgren, Hampel, Howe, Kennett 4-2 (36-43)
Ht 14..Swiderski, Hefenbrock, Schramm, Klindt 2-4 (38-47)
Ht 15..Lindgren, Iversen, Miskowiak, Kennett 5-1 (43-48)

Notes:

1..Ht 4 and Hefenbrock replaces Hansen for Wolverhampton.
2..Ht 4 and Swiderski replaces Schramm for Ipswich.
3..Ht 4 and we've a re-run without Ipswich's Swiderski who takes a tumble and is excluded.
4..Ht 5 and we've a re-run without Wolverhampton's Klindt who takes a tumble and is excluded.
5..Ht 5 and the race is awarded after Wolverhampton's Iversen gets into mischief and is excluded.
6..Ht 10 and we've a re-run without Wolverhampton's Dryml who gets into mischief and is excluded.
7..Ht 11 and Hansen replaces Hefenbrock for Wolverhampton.
8..Ht 12 and Lindgren replaces Hansen as a Tactical Substitute off a 15 metre handicap for Wolverhampton.
9..Ht 14 and Ipswich's Johnston is withdrawn from the meeting.
10..Ht 14 and Swiderski replaces Johnston for Ipswich.
11..Ht 15 and it's Lindgren ( R )-Iversen ( B ) for Wolverhampton and it's Miskowiak ( G )-Kennett ( Y ) for Ipswich.

[jimblanchard]

I'll be keen to see this one sub and hope we get some decent speedway. Will be interesting to hear what the demented witch rants about the meeting, whatever the result. (I am not referring to any Ipswich fan either... )

Looking forward to it. ;D

[Deleted]

I'll have to be honest and admit that, if we win, I don't give a flying fuck how boring the meeting is!!! Fingers crossed anyway - the boys are fired up and raring to go after last night, so let us at those Wolves!!

[Deleted]

May 18, 2008 14:58:54 GMT @witch said:

I'll have to be honest and admit that, if we win, I don't give a flying fuck how boring the meeting is!!!

Totally agree Witch...............I think I'm the only person on the internet who enjoyed Lakeside's win at Monmore..............but WTF...........it was a brilliant meeting from this angle.

[Deleted]

For obvious reasons I hope we can get our 2nd away win, but more so is the fact that Bug eye- Gurning doesn't give us any hope, so please boys rub his face in it tonight

[Deleted]

I can't see the Witches winning tonight - for the simple reasons that Edward Kennett is guesting at number 1 (he's not a number 1), and that Tobi Kroner is back at number 3, and I'd be very surprised if he scores more than about 5 or 6. I can see this being quite easy for the Wolves actually, with a 13 point victory.
Wolves 53-40 Ipswich.

[Deleted]

I've given into temptation and had Sky Sports put back on just for this.

I'm looking forward to jeering Millard (is he still there?) and that bug eyed twat. Master of the bleeding obvious, that one

Away win number two for the Witches, 44-46, all from the gate will do me

[Deleted]

May 19, 2008 14:48:17 GMT @badge said:

For obvious reasons I hope we can get our 2nd away win, but more so is the fact that Bug eye- Gurning doesn't give us any hope, so please boys rub his face in it tonight

Agreed - second away in as many days will really make a few sit up and take notice and hopefully render aforementioned plonker speechless at the same time which will be two results in one

[Deleted]

With a bit of luck he'll tip Wolves to win, that's a sure fire way of ensuring they don't... ;D

I'm feeling a bit speedway deprived , so I'm hoping for a good meeting, with no Tony Millard....

[Deleted]

Pearson and Tatum in their portable box, so I would guess that Millard is commentating. (*sigh*)

[Deleted]

Oh dear, gaffs a plenty tonight then...

[Deleted]

No Millard! Pearson and Tatum have ''a wonderful view'' apparently.

[Deleted]

Did Kelvin Tatum just suggest that Swiderski can go off 15 metres? Errr, he's been EXCLUDED, Kelvin.

[admin]

May 19, 2008 18:56:39 GMT @mildenhall07 said:

Did Kelvin Tatum just suggest that Swiderski can go off 15 metres? Errr, he's been EXCLUDED, Kelvin.

Yes, he did.
Once again Kelvin Tatum MBE displaying his ignorance of the basic rules of speedway - the bloke's a cretin, as well as an EME.