|
|
Post by schumi on Jun 9, 2009 19:06:41 GMT
Oddly, three meetings finish in a 55-41 score. Vargarna will be thoroughly miserable with their home defeat, and Dackarna will once again be looking at Hans Andersen, who was replaced in his third heat and only managed to score 2 points.
|
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jun 9, 2009 19:16:38 GMT
And Piraterna take the win, saving money in the process. Thanks for joining me, and goodnight.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 19:19:17 GMT
Smederna managed a 10p loss away against piraterna and i think the main reason is 0p on King and that the reserves are to weak.
This would be my team for next weak:
1.KK
2.King
3.Zorro
4.Max
5.Jagus
6.Henrik Karlsson
7. Vaculik/Miskowiak
8. Robin Berqvist.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 19:29:53 GMT
yeah i agree with that Erik. I wonder if any team can stop Vetlanda from taking the title this year. Possible Lejonen It's hard to see anyone top Vetlanda, considering how strong they are at home. But it's still early days, and alot can happen. Right now they are certainly the strongest team in Sweden though. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 20:50:35 GMT
Smederna managed a 10p loss away against piraterna and i think the main reason is 0p on King and that the reserves are to weak. This would be my team for next weak: 1.KK 2.King 3.Zorro 4.Max 5.Jagus 6.Henrik Karlsson 7. Vaculik/Miskowiak 8. Robin Berqvist. I'm surprised King rode TBH, he crashed last week  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 21:13:40 GMT
i know badge but there weren't any other riders available, Batchelor and Vaculik apparently didnt feel fit enough for Elitserien despite that they werer doing well in the QP Quals. Miskowiak said that he didnt have any engines ready on such a short notice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 9, 2009 21:24:45 GMT
Vetlanda versus Dackarna Vetlanda..551..L Richardson..0,3,2,3,3 = 112..P Ljung..2,1',0,0 = 3+13..J Hampel..3,3,3,1,2' = 12+14..T H Jonasson..0,0,2',0 = 2+15..J Crump..2',2,3,2',3 = 12+26..P Hougaard..3,3,0,3,0 = 97..A Gomolski..2',2,1',1 = 6+28..R Aspegren.. DNRDackarna..411..A Jonsson..3,2,1,3,3,1 = 132..R Schlein..1,1',1,2,1' = 6+23..K Bjerre..2,2,0,1',0,2 = 7+14..F Lindgren..1',3,1',3,2',0 = 10+35..H Andersen..1,0,1 = 26..N Klindt..0,0,2 = 27..L Lindgren..1,0,0 = 18..N Larsson.. DNRHt 1..65.2..Jonsson, Ljung, Schlein, Richardson 2-4 (2-4) Ht 2..65.4..Hougaard, Gomolski, L Lindgren, Klindt 5-1 (7-5) Ht 3..65.0..Hampel, Bjerre, F Lindgren, Jonasson 3-3 (10-8) Ht 4..65.2..Hougaard, Crump, Andersen, L Lindgren 5-1 (15-9) Ht 5..65.2..F Lindgren, Gomolski, Ljung, Klindt 3-3 (18-12) Ht 6..64.9..Hampel, Jonsson, Schlein, Jonasson 3-3 (21-15) Ht 7..65.2..Richardson, Bjerre, F Lindgren, Ljung 3-3 (24-18) Ht 8..65.1..Hampel, Jonasson, Jonsson, Andersen 5-1 (29-19) Ht 9..65.2..Jonsson, Crump, Schlein, Hougaard 2-4 (31-23) Ht 10..65.7..F Lindgren, Richardson, Gomolski, Bjerre [Ret] 3-3 (34-26) Ht 11..66.0..Hougaard, Klindt, Gomolski, L Lindgren 4-2 (38-28) Ht 12..65.1..Crump, Schlein, Bjerre, Jonasson 3-3 (41-31) Ht 13..66.4..Jonsson, F Lindgren, Hampel, Ljung 1-5 (42-36) Ht 14..66.8..Richardson, Crump, Andersen, Bjerre 5-1 (47-37) Ht 15..66.2..Richardson, Bjerre, Schlein, Hougaard 3-3 (50-40) Ht 16..66.1..Crump, Hampel, Jonsson, F Lindgren 5-1 (55-41) After the fantastic semifinals between the two teams last September, this can hardly be described as a classic derby clash. A few good heats were served, though far apart. Highlights being Hampel's last bend blast around against Bjerre in heat 3, the Hampel/Jonasson maximum against GP riders Jonsson (tact/sub) and Andersen, Jonsson/Lindgren's maximum against a chasing Hampel in heat 13, but most of all a fantastic heat 14 which was worth the admission money alone! For Elit Vetlanda, Richardson had an uncharacteristic bad first outing, but overall is rock solid as third heat leader. Ljung was a bit more into the races than the score suggest, but a paid four is not good enough at home. Hampel has a dud ride in 90% of his meetings, this one was no exception, but can always be counted upon to deliver heat victories. Jonasson was slow all night, but somehow managed to fend off Jonsson in heat 8. Crump had to work some work his points today, he might have actually enjoyed that. Hougaard blew hot and cold, go figure. Gomolski did a great job as a No 7, mainly thanks to good gating, however a paid eight seems well paid for the job done. For Dackarna, Jonsson produced some exciting races, as well as racking up points. Wasn't close in his last, but nevertheless deserved his score. Schlein was way better than before in Vetlanda, beat an opponent in each of his heats and you really can't ask for more than that. A pleasent surprise. Bjerre looked slow and passive for most of the night. Lindgren had one of his better Vetlanda meeting for ages, but earned it all for sure. Andersen had a fighting third outing for the Dackarna outfit, but one can wonder if he should have had that (a third outing) in the first place. Klindt was disappointment after his splendid effort in the semifinals last year, thought it has to be said that the opposition was much tougher this time. Lindgren did what could be expected around this track. Man of the match: Jason Crump Most exciting rider: Andreas Jonsson |
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jun 10, 2009 9:54:31 GMT
Zorro said of last night's planned exculsion, where Piraterna's Linus Sundström deliberately broke the tapes to allow Lindback to take his place, that it was a fair enough use of the rules, and that they'd have done the same thing in their position. But unfortunately Smederna's reserves are not strong enough, so there was nothing they could do. Despite defeat, Bosse Jansson is proud of how well his team fought.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2009 9:57:33 GMT
About the TT i cant really understand why they didnt put in Antonio in the first place?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2009 12:19:10 GMT
About the TT i cant really understand why they didnt put in Antonio in the first place? In this case, it doesn't seem to make much sense. The only logical explanation would be to lower his average. However, if it had been planned that Lindbäck would ride two on the trot, with Sundström's heat being the second one, then Sundström could have given Lindbäck some extra time by breaking the tapes. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2009 12:32:03 GMT
About the TT i cant really understand why they didnt put in Antonio in the first place? In this case, it doesn't seem to make much sense. The only logical explanation would be to lower his average. However, if it had been planned that Lindbäck would ride two on the trot, with Sundström's heat being the second one, then Sundström could have given Lindbäck some extra time by breaking the tapes. yeah your final line do make some sense. Possible this maybe would need to be looked over for next season. so that it will be that when a rider scores a TT the nr8 rider will be allowed to be put in and not any of the regular reseves or no other rider at all. |
|
|
|
Post by schumi on Jun 10, 2009 14:37:10 GMT
However, if it had been planned that Lindbäck would ride two on the trot, with Sundström's heat being the second one, then Sundström could have given Lindbäck some extra time by breaking the tapes. It was the first one, but Lindback was programmed to ride in the subsequent two heats. Here's how the table's looking after round 7: Team..Played..Won..Drawn..Lost..For-Against..Points1..Vetlanda..6..5..1..0..327-249..11 2..Dackarna..6..3..2..1..281-271..8 3..Vastervik..5..3..1..1..248-232..7 4..Piraterna..6..3..0..3..307-268..6 5..Indianerna..7..3..0..4..336-336...6 6..Lejonen..6..2..1..3..275-277..5 7..Smederna..7..2..1..4..321-351..5 8..Vargarna..5..1..1..3..221-258..3 9..Rospiggarna..6..1..1..4..251-325..3 |
|
